“One cannot step twice into the same river.” Explain this idea of Heraclitus. How is Parmenides view on reality different from Heraclitus? What is your personal evaluation on these two great philosophers?
“One cannot step twice into the same river.” this idea of Heraclitus.
This sentence is a metaphor for his vision that everything is always changing. This idea, that the water and life of the river is always changing, although the river seems to remain the same, probably extends to life in general. People are never one, they evolve in some way as a result of our daily experience and society is no exception.
As I would see it, Heraclitus’ remark clarifies that on the off chance that I experience something that changes my life, I should get back to it. This isn’t on the grounds that I will have a similar impact without fail, but since consistently, third and ninth I experience with it will be exceptional.
The facts confirm that no man goes to a similar stream twice. The waves are particular. The sand has moved. The fish that used to live in the streams have been gathered by cheerful anglers. Regardless of whether you can stroll inside, get out, then, at that point, return promptly, you will enter an alternate water a subsequent time.
Parmenides view on reality different from Heraclitus
“Yes”, Parmenides view on reality different from Heraclitus. I break down these two prestigious scholars and give my reaction beneath:
As per Heraclitus, ‘the one’ who offered the remark about waterways is Heraclitus, a pre-Socratic and postmodern rationalist who has been misquoted on New Age sites and cited outside the current discussion by everybody since all we have of his corpus are confined pieces. Would could it be that Heraclitus accepts people are unequipped for doing? Clearly, I can do a little in-and-out mix with my foot on a riverbed.
In any case, is it the very stream that streams over my foot and purges into the sea as new waters join the waterway at its source, and am I a similar individual, As indicated by one translation of Heraclitus, he is conveying an otherworldly message.
We utilize the word waterway to portray whatever is continually changing, which might persuade us to think that things are steadier than they are, or that there are any steady things whatsoever. Our thing bound jargon is unequipped for catching the endless progression of the real world.
by Md. Rabby Sharif Ador